Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Monday, February 23, 2015
Sunday, February 15, 2015
Friday, February 13, 2015
UN: Islamic State torturing, killing children in Iraq
UN: Islamic State torturing, killing children in Iraq
AP
UN: Islamic State torturing, killing children in Iraq
Associated Press
BERLIN (February 5, 2015) — The United Nations says Islamic State terrorists are systematically killing, torturing and raping children and families of minority groups in Iraq, and it is calling on government forces there to do more to protect them.In a report issued Wednesday in Geneva, the U.N. Committee on the Rights of the Child said it has received reports of "several cases of mass executions of boys, as well as reports of beheadings, crucifixions of children and burying children alive."
Iraq's military has been struggling in its fight against Islamic State, and the government has pleaded repeatedly for more weapons and training.
Still, the U.N. agency urged that more be done, saying Iraq needs to "take all necessary actions to ensure the safety and protection of children and their families."
Iraq's military has been struggling in its fight against Islamic State, and the government has pleaded repeatedly for more weapons and training.
Still, the U.N. agency urged that more be done, saying Iraq needs to "take all necessary actions to ensure the safety and protection of children and their families."
GOP lawmakers: Scrap Obama health law, use tax credits
GOP lawmakers: Scrap Obama health law, use tax credits
AP
GOP lawmakers: Scrap Obama health law, use tax credits
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (February 5, 2015) — Three Republican lawmakers eager to repeal President Barack Obama's health care overhaul are touting tax credits and greater leeway for states and health insurers as the GOP unveiled its first plan this year for replacing the law that the party reviles.Republicans released the outline Wednesday as Democrats continue pounding away at them for pledging to repeal and replace Obama's law, practically since its 2010 enactment, without advancing a substitute. That's a growing political liability for Republicans because the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that this year, 19 million Americans will receive coverage as a result of the law, including large numbers in GOP-dominated states.
"We need to be prepared to talk about something we could support," said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., one of the proposal's authors.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., a Finance panel member, also wrote the proposal.
The plan — it's not in legislative language and may not be anytime soon — erases the existing law's coverage requirements for individuals and employers. It eliminates the state and HealthCare.gov federal insurance marketplaces where insurance can be purchased and ends virtually everything established by the health care law, including taxes it imposes on medical devices and other things to finance enlarged coverage.
Also gone would be the health care overhaul's expansion of Medicaid, the federal-state health insurance program for the poor. Instead, states would be given more freedom to decide how to spend the program's federal funds.
Republican aides said the plan's sponsors would need to talk to congressional colleagues and governors, and possibly make changes, before translating their principles into a bill. That could be a drawn-out process, but it would further delay the political vulnerability possible when ideas are transformed into detailed legislation.
Further stretching the timeline is a Supreme Court decision, expected this June, on a case in which critics of Obama's law claim that many subsidies it gives millions of people to help them afford health coverage are illegal. Should the plaintiffs win, Congress might have to spend time rewriting parts of the statute.
Every voting Republican in Congress opposed the health care law when it was enacted. When the House voted this week to repeal the law — a measure unlikely to pass in the Senate and that faces a promised veto from Obama — only three Republicans voted no.
GOP aides said their proposal had no official estimates of cost or the numbers of people it would cover. They said they believed their plan would save money and be competitive with coverage under Obama's program.
As under Obama's law, insurers would be required to include children up to age 26 under their families' policies, though states could end that requirement. Unlike Obama's law, states could decide whether to provide maternity coverage.
People with pre-existing medical conditions could not be turned down for insurance, as long as they did not have a gap in coverage that lasted more than roughly two months, congressional aides said.
As with Obama's law, there would be no lifetime limits on coverage.
People working for firms with 100 or fewer employees would be eligible for tax credits to help pay for health care, as would people earning up to triple the federal poverty level. That would mean people earning up to approximately $35,000, and larger amounts for families, would qualify for some assistance.
For people who don't sign up for coverage, states would be allowed to automatically enroll some of them in plans. Such people, though, could completely opt out of coverage anyway.
To raise money, the GOP plan would impose taxes on the value of employer-provided health coverage exceeding $12,000 for individuals and $30,000 for families, amounts that would grow as inflation rises.
Limits would be placed on awards from medical malpractice lawsuits, and insurance companies would be allowed to sell policies across state lines. Republicans said both steps were designed to help lower coverage costs.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., a Finance panel member, also wrote the proposal.
The plan — it's not in legislative language and may not be anytime soon — erases the existing law's coverage requirements for individuals and employers. It eliminates the state and HealthCare.gov federal insurance marketplaces where insurance can be purchased and ends virtually everything established by the health care law, including taxes it imposes on medical devices and other things to finance enlarged coverage.
Also gone would be the health care overhaul's expansion of Medicaid, the federal-state health insurance program for the poor. Instead, states would be given more freedom to decide how to spend the program's federal funds.
Republican aides said the plan's sponsors would need to talk to congressional colleagues and governors, and possibly make changes, before translating their principles into a bill. That could be a drawn-out process, but it would further delay the political vulnerability possible when ideas are transformed into detailed legislation.
Further stretching the timeline is a Supreme Court decision, expected this June, on a case in which critics of Obama's law claim that many subsidies it gives millions of people to help them afford health coverage are illegal. Should the plaintiffs win, Congress might have to spend time rewriting parts of the statute.
Every voting Republican in Congress opposed the health care law when it was enacted. When the House voted this week to repeal the law — a measure unlikely to pass in the Senate and that faces a promised veto from Obama — only three Republicans voted no.
GOP aides said their proposal had no official estimates of cost or the numbers of people it would cover. They said they believed their plan would save money and be competitive with coverage under Obama's program.
As under Obama's law, insurers would be required to include children up to age 26 under their families' policies, though states could end that requirement. Unlike Obama's law, states could decide whether to provide maternity coverage.
People with pre-existing medical conditions could not be turned down for insurance, as long as they did not have a gap in coverage that lasted more than roughly two months, congressional aides said.
As with Obama's law, there would be no lifetime limits on coverage.
People working for firms with 100 or fewer employees would be eligible for tax credits to help pay for health care, as would people earning up to triple the federal poverty level. That would mean people earning up to approximately $35,000, and larger amounts for families, would qualify for some assistance.
For people who don't sign up for coverage, states would be allowed to automatically enroll some of them in plans. Such people, though, could completely opt out of coverage anyway.
To raise money, the GOP plan would impose taxes on the value of employer-provided health coverage exceeding $12,000 for individuals and $30,000 for families, amounts that would grow as inflation rises.
Limits would be placed on awards from medical malpractice lawsuits, and insurance companies would be allowed to sell policies across state lines. Republicans said both steps were designed to help lower coverage costs.
Warning: Muslim political party gaining momentum in U.S.
Warning: Muslim political party gaining momentum in U.S.
Politics-govt
Warning: Muslim political party gaining momentum in U.S.
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com) Thursday, February 05, 2015
A conservative Christian activist says a new political party formed by the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States is moving forward with its ultimate agenda: the destruction of America from within. He credits President Obama with at least some of the group's success thus far. Matt Barber is a constitutional attorney and the founder of BarbWire.com. He says last year radical Muslims decided to flex their political muscles by organizing a new political party, which is now in full swing.
"The Muslim Brotherhood, while it's being shut down in Egypt, is gaining momentum in the United States – and that is in large part due to President Obama's support for this organization," he tells OneNewsNow. "A Muslim Brotherhood front group, the United Council of Muslim Organizations, has been working in Obama's stomping grounds in Chicago to develop a political party."
As far back as April 2014, a commentary at Investors.com warned about the groups behind the formation of the political party – among them the Washington, DC-based Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Muslim American Society, both of which have been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood in federal court documents.
That same commentary pointed out that the chairman of new party is "none other than Oussama Jammal, who once headed the notorious Bridgeview Mosque in Chicago."
According to Barber, the new party's goals are clear: "Here we have Islamists using our Constitution and the freedoms guaranteed by our United States Constitution in order to effectively undermine, and if possible destroy, the freedoms provided in our ... Constitution and supplant with that Sharia law."
Terrorism expert and former PLO member Walid Shoebat said last year that it's not uncommon for the Muslim Brotherhood to have a separate political party that does its bidding. He pointed out that Egypt's Freedom and Justice Party was the party of Mohammed Morsi, the former president of that country who is currently on trial in Cairo for espionage on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood.
What's your reaction to news that Muslims are working to establish a political party in the U.S.? (Poll Closed)
Total Votes: 4,001
"The Muslim Brotherhood, while it's being shut down in Egypt, is gaining momentum in the United States – and that is in large part due to President Obama's support for this organization," he tells OneNewsNow. "A Muslim Brotherhood front group, the United Council of Muslim Organizations, has been working in Obama's stomping grounds in Chicago to develop a political party."
As far back as April 2014, a commentary at Investors.com warned about the groups behind the formation of the political party – among them the Washington, DC-based Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Muslim American Society, both of which have been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood in federal court documents.
That same commentary pointed out that the chairman of new party is "none other than Oussama Jammal, who once headed the notorious Bridgeview Mosque in Chicago."
According to Barber, the new party's goals are clear: "Here we have Islamists using our Constitution and the freedoms guaranteed by our United States Constitution in order to effectively undermine, and if possible destroy, the freedoms provided in our ... Constitution and supplant with that Sharia law."
Terrorism expert and former PLO member Walid Shoebat said last year that it's not uncommon for the Muslim Brotherhood to have a separate political party that does its bidding. He pointed out that Egypt's Freedom and Justice Party was the party of Mohammed Morsi, the former president of that country who is currently on trial in Cairo for espionage on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Monday, February 9, 2015
Friday, February 6, 2015
Monday, February 2, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)